Transatlantic Trade Partnership Agreement
Nevertheless, France`s position also reminds us that priority must be given to multilateralism and that more coherence must be found between European trade policy and the fight against climate change. In the short term and in the run-up to the European elections, this allows Emmanuel Macron to make visible the coherence of the LREM program. EU-wide efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions will continue to have a limited impact on the fight against climate change, which is by definition a global problem. Instead of opposing trade and the fight against climate change, it is now a question of promoting European standards for sustainable development through eu trade negotiations, so that the production methods of their trading partners can also change. This is the line that his government has been defending since 2017 and is reflected in the report on the implementation of CETA. It is therefore also a signal that France is pleased to make this issue one of the priorities of the next Commission. However, after the Midterms of November 2014, the President moved to an active leadership position. In his State of the Union address in January 2015, the President urged Congress to give him the power to promote trade and underscored his support for the TPP and TTIP. Since then, the White House has launched extensive lobbying and engaged the entire cabinet to influence Congress and speak out in favor of the TPA and free trade agreements across the country. The White House and Froman have systematically addressed major democratic electoral groups (including unions that oppose free trade agreements) and prominent members of the Democratic Congress. And in unprecedented action (at least for Obama, whose retail capabilities were minimal with Congress), the president only called Senator Hatch (R-UT), chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, and the senator himself.
Ron Wyden (D-OR), a high-ranking member to push them to find a compromise that would break traffic jams at TPA. The twenty-seven governments of the Member States of the European Union must approve the partnership unanimously, in accordance with Articles 207 and 218 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, through the agreement negotiated within the Council of the European Union, and the European Parliament is invited to approve it. The European Parliament has the power to approve or reject the agreement. In the event that the Council of the European Union, on a proposal from the European Commission, qualifies the TTIP as a “mixed agreement”, the agreement of all the parliaments of the EU Member States is required according to individual constitutional procedures before the agreement can enter into force. In the United States, both houses of Congress must pass the agreement before it can be ratified.  The content of the draft agreements and the reports of rounds of negotiations are classified by the public, an agreement that The Independent has criticized as “mysterious and undemocratic.”  As already stated, elected representatives can only consult texts in a secure “reading room” in Brussels, in order to avoid further information on the TTIP negotiations being made public. In 2016, Greenpeace published 248 pages of secret documents from the TTIP trade negotiations.  Greenpeace Netherlands said it published the documents “in order to create much-needed transparency and spark an informed debate about the treaty.”  Despite Obama`s public commitment to the Transpazifik, the US and the EU. . .